Elawyers Elawyers
Virginia| Change

McLean v. Bradley, 95-1708 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-1708 Visitors: 23
Filed: Mar. 29, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-1708 ANTHONY LAWRENCE MCLEAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JERRY BRADLEY; MERCHANT ASSOCIATION; LAURA BROWN; EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION SERVICES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-94-886-R) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: March 29, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-1708 ANTHONY LAWRENCE MCLEAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JERRY BRADLEY; MERCHANT ASSOCIATION; LAURA BROWN; EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION SERVICES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-94-886-R) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: March 29, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Lawrence McLean, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Leslie Schor, SMITH, SOMERVILLE & CASE, Washington, D.C.; James A. Murphy, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTH, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing with prejudice his civil suit against Defendants and awarding costs and attorney's fees as a sanction for Appellant's misconduct. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McLean v. Bradley, No. CA-94-886-R (E.D. Va. Feb. 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer