Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ross v. Inco Alloys Intl, 95-1838 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-1838 Visitors: 30
Filed: Mar. 19, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-1838 PATRICIA A. ROSS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus INCO ALLOYS INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, District Judge. (CA-92-192-3) Submitted: December 5, 1995 Decided: March 19, 1996 Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished p
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-1838 PATRICIA A. ROSS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus INCO ALLOYS INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, District Judge. (CA-92-192-3) Submitted: December 5, 1995 Decided: March 19, 1996 Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patricia A. Ross, Appellant Pro Se. John Earl Jenkins, Jr., JENKINS, FENSTERMAKER, KRIEGER, KAYES & FARRELL, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting Appellee partial summary judgment and dismissing her claims of employment discrimination on partial summary judgment and after a bench trial. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ross v. Inco Alloys Interna- tional, Inc., No. CA-92-192-3 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 5, 1994; Apr. 4, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer