Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Dodds v. United Airlines, Inc, 95-1894 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-1894 Visitors: 37
Filed: Sep. 26, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-1894 LEWIS R. DODDS, Plaintiff - Appellant, and COMMERCIAL ENERGIES, INCORPORATED; GREGORY KELLAM SCOTT, Plaintiffs, versus UNITED AIRLINES, INC., a Delaware corporation; METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON AIRPORTS AUTHORITY; JANELLE MCARTHUR; CHRISTOPHER D. SMEAL; R. P. HARRIS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (C
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-1894 LEWIS R. DODDS, Plaintiff - Appellant, and COMMERCIAL ENERGIES, INCORPORATED; GREGORY KELLAM SCOTT, Plaintiffs, versus UNITED AIRLINES, INC., a Delaware corporation; METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON AIRPORTS AUTHORITY; JANELLE MCARTHUR; CHRISTOPHER D. SMEAL; R. P. HARRIS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-93-120-A) Submitted: September 10, 1996 Decided: September 26, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lewis R. Dodds, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Anne Newman, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, Washington, D.C.; Thomas J. Byrne, Barry Alan Schwartz, BYRNE, KIELY & WHITE, Denver, Colorado, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1985(3) (1994) claim. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dodds v. United Airlines, Inc., No. CA-93-120-A (E.D. Va. Mar. 15, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer