Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Downs v. Commonwealth of VA, 95-1941 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-1941 Visitors: 26
Filed: Jan. 29, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-1941 BEATRICE DOWNS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Virginia Common- wealth University, Medical College of Virginia Hospitals; WANDA MILLER; COURTNEY COSBY; ELAINE WALKER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-94-862) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 29, 1996 Before R
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-1941 BEATRICE DOWNS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Virginia Common- wealth University, Medical College of Virginia Hospitals; WANDA MILLER; COURTNEY COSBY; ELAINE WALKER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-94-862) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 29, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Beatrice Downs, Appellant Pro Se. David Lee Ross, VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY, Richmond, Virginia; Pamela Finley Boston, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing her employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Downs v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. CA-94-862 (E.D. Va. Apr. 27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer