Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gordon v. E I Dupont De Nemour, 95-2274 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-2274 Visitors: 485
Filed: Mar. 29, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2274 BETTY T. GORDON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-50) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: March 29, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,* Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublishe
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2274 BETTY T. GORDON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-50) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: March 29, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,* Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Betty T. Gordon, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia Kyle Epps, Hill B. Wellford, Jr., Wood Walter Lay, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. * Senior Judge Butzner did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C.A. § 12101-12213 (West 1990) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gordon v. E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co., No. CA-94- 50 (W. D. Va. May 26, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer