Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Clark v. American Home Fndg, 95-2436 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-2436 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jan. 23, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2436 In Re: GLORIA AMELIA CLARK, Debtor. _ GLORIA AMELIA CLARK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus AMERICAN HOME FUNDING, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-922-CV-2, BK-94-22796-B) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Af
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2436 In Re: GLORIA AMELIA CLARK, Debtor. _________________________ GLORIA AMELIA CLARK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus AMERICAN HOME FUNDING, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-922-CV-2, BK-94-22796-B) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gloria Amelia Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Roane Willcox, Jr., WILLCOX & BAIRD, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's order denying her motion for reconsideration of a prior order granting relief from the automatic stay to Ameri- can Home Funding, Inc. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Clark v. American Home Funding, Inc., No. CA-94-922-CV-2 (E.D. Va. June 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer