Filed: Jan. 31, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2520 LYDIA PERALTA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LEVINDALE HEBREW GERIATRIC CENTER AND HOSPITAL, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-3298-HAR) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: January 31, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2520 LYDIA PERALTA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LEVINDALE HEBREW GERIATRIC CENTER AND HOSPITAL, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-3298-HAR) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: January 31, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2520
LYDIA PERALTA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LEVINDALE HEBREW GERIATRIC CENTER AND HOSPITAL,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge.
(CA-94-3298-HAR)
Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: January 31, 1996
Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lydia Peralta, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Joseph Gutman, Vincent
Michael Wills, BLUM, YUMKAS, MAILMAN, GUTMAN & DENICK, P.A.,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting
summary judgment in the Appellee's favor on her claims of national
origin discrimination and retaliatory discharge in violation of
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A.
ยงยง 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1981 & Supp. 1995). We have reviewed the
record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Peralta v. Levindale Hebrew Geriatric Center and Hospital,
No. CA-94-3298-HAR (D. Md. Aug. 1, 1995). We deny Appellant's
motion for sanctions and dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2