UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 2BD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; A. JOHN BRISCUSO, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR QUEEN ANNE'S COUNTY; WILLIAM V. RIGGS, III, President, County Commissioners for Queen Anne's County; ARCHIBALD A. MACGLASHAN, III, Vice-President, County Commissioners for Queen Anne's County; OSCAR A. SCHULZ, No. 95-2763 Commissioner, County Commissioners for Queen Anne's County, Defendants-Appellees, and MARION R. LEAVERTON, Chairman, Board of Appeals for Queen Anne's County; MICHAEL R. FOSTER, Counsel to the Board of Appeals for Queen Anne's County, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-698-K) Argued: June 5, 1996 Decided: June 24, 1996 Before WIDENER, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges. _________________________________________________________________ Vacated and remanded with instructions by unpublished per curiam opinion. _________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL ARGUED: William D. Evans, Jr., Warren Kenneth Rich, RICH & HENDERSON, P.C., Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellants. Richard Timothy Colaresi, SHAPIRO & OLANDER, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Judith Bernstein-Gaeta, SHAPIRO & OLANDER, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellees. _________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). _________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM: Expressing no opinion on the merits of this case as presented, or on the effect thereupon of Quackenbush v. Allstate Insurance Company, No. 95-244, ___ U.S. ___ (June 3, 1996), we are of opin- ion that the judgment of the district court should be vacated and this case should be remanded for the district court to reconsider its entire decision, especially including any effect thereupon had by Quackenbush. In so doing, the district court may initiate such pro- ceedings as it may deem appropriate. VACATED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS 2