Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Cole v. Jewell Ridge Coal, 95-2812 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-2812 Visitors: 41
Filed: Mar. 26, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2812 STUART COLE, Petitioner, versus JEWELL RIDGE COAL CORPORATION; DIRECTOR, OF- FICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents. On Petition for Review of An Order of the Benefits Review Board. (84-3344-BLA) Submitted: March 12, 1996 Decided: March 26, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stuart Cole, Petitioner Pro
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2812 STUART COLE, Petitioner, versus JEWELL RIDGE COAL CORPORATION; DIRECTOR, OF- FICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents. On Petition for Review of An Order of the Benefits Review Board. (84-3344-BLA) Submitted: March 12, 1996 Decided: March 26, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stuart Cole, Petitioner Pro Se. Michael Francis Blair, PENN, STUART, ESKRIDGE & JONES, Abingdon, Virginia; Christian P. Barber, Sarah Marie Hurley, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order modifying the administrative law judge's award of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. ยงยง 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1995). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Cole v. Jewell Ridge Coal Corp., No. 84-3344-BLA (BRB Aug. 14, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer