Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Edwards, 95-2874 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-2874 Visitors: 14
Filed: Dec. 04, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2874 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus PATRICIA D. EDWARDS, a/k/a Patricia D. Lancaster, Defendant - Appellant, and MICHAEL W. LANCASTER, Defendant, CLOVER M. FARMS, INCORPORATED, Garnishee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Franklin T. Dupree, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-94-685-5-D) Submitted: October 31, 1996 Decided: December 4,
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2874 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus PATRICIA D. EDWARDS, a/k/a Patricia D. Lancaster, Defendant - Appellant, and MICHAEL W. LANCASTER, Defendant, CLOVER M. FARMS, INCORPORATED, Garnishee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Franklin T. Dupree, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-94-685-5-D) Submitted: October 31, 1996 Decided: December 4, 1996 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patricia D. Edwards, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce Charles Johnson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting the Appellee a deficiency judgment against her. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Edwards, No. CA-94-685-5-D (E.D.N.C. Aug. 16 & Aug. 23, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer