Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

In Re: Frazier v., 95-2879 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-2879 Visitors: 67
Filed: Feb. 28, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2879 In Re: REGINALD L. FRAZIER, Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (MISC-490-3-5-F) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 28, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reginald L. Frazier, Appellant Pro Se. Unpub
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2879 In Re: REGINALD L. FRAZIER, Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (MISC-490-3-5-F) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 28, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reginald L. Frazier, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Reginald Frazier appeals the district court's denial of his application for reinstatement to practice law in the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina. In addition, he petitions this court for a writ of mandamus or prohibition directing the district court to grant his application. Frazier was disbarred in North Carolina in 1989, and his petition for reinstatement was denied in 1995. Since Frazier is not a licensed attorney, we find no error in the district court's ruling and deny the petition for writ of mandamus or prohibition. Frazier's application to proceed in forma pauperis is denied and this matter is dismissed. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer