Filed: Mar. 28, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-3007 SALLY N. NOVERAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BON SECOURS HOSPITAL, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-3319-HAR) Submitted: March 19, 1996 Decided: March 28, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sally N. N
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-3007 SALLY N. NOVERAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BON SECOURS HOSPITAL, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-3319-HAR) Submitted: March 19, 1996 Decided: March 28, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sally N. No..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-3007 SALLY N. NOVERAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BON SECOURS HOSPITAL, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-3319-HAR) Submitted: March 19, 1996 Decided: March 28, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sally N. Noveras, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Stewart Wescott, ASTROTH, SEROTTE & ROCKMAN, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting De- fendant's motion for summary judgment in Appellant's action brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. ยงยง 2000e-2, -3, -5 (West 1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Noveras v. Bon Secours Hospital, No. CA-94-3319-HAR (D. Md. Oct. 27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2