UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.                                                                     No. 95-5497

ROY L. EQUILS,
Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge.
(CR-94-114)

Submitted: February 27, 1996

Decided: March 20, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

John O. Venner, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellant. Helen F.
Fahey, United States Attorney, Richard C. Stephenson, Special Assis-
tant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See
Local Rule 36(c).
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Roy L. Equils was convicted by a jury of forgery of worthless
checks, 18 U.S.C. § 7 (1988), 18 U.S.C.A.§ 13 (West Supp. 1995),
assimilating Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-172 (Michie 1988) (Counts 1-4);
uttering worthless checks (Counts 5-8); and theft of government prop-
erty, 18 U.S.C.A. § 641 (West Supp. 1995) (Counts 9-12). He appeals
his 60-month sentence, alleging that the district court erred in depart-
ing upward under USSG § 4A1.3, p.s.* We affirm.

Between November 2, 1992, and January 15, 1993, while his room-
mate, Michael Yates, was confined in the Naval Brig in Norfolk, Vir-
ginia, Equils used Yates's checkbook to write checks totaling $9068
at military exchanges in Virginia, as well as at Camp Pendleton, Cali-
fornia, and Cherry Point, North Carolina. Equils's criminal record
included 31 convictions between 1981 and 1994 for theft, credit card
fraud, forgery, and similar offenses, as well as a conviction for
escape. With 26 criminal history points, Equils was in criminal his-
tory category VI.

At sentencing, the government requested an upward departure on
the ground that category VI inadequately represented Equils's past
criminal conduct and the likelihood that he would commit more
crimes. See USSG § 4A1.3. The district court agreed that an upward
departure was warranted. Because Equils was already in the highest
criminal history category, the court departed upward by 7 offense
levels, making the guideline range 51-63 months, and imposed a sen-
tence of 60 months. Equils contends that the district court departed
without justification and did not adequately explain its reason for
departing by 7 offense levels.

Departures are reviewed under the test set out in United States v.
Hummer, 

, 192 (4th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 

(1991). The district court's decision that a relevant factor has not
been adequately considered under the guidelines is normally given de
_________________________________________________________________
*United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual (Nov.
1994).

                    2
novo review; however, a departure is authorized by USSG § 4A1.3
when the defendant's criminal history category does not sufficiently
reflect the seriousness of his criminal record. The district court's
determination that a defendant's criminal history category inade-
quately represents his past criminal conduct is a factual question
reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard. 

. Because Equils had 26 criminal history points, the district court
did not clearly err in finding that category VI did not adequately
reflect his past criminal conduct.

The district court's determination of the extent of a departure is
reviewed for abuse of discretion. 

category VI
may be accomplished by extrapolating additional criminal history cat-
egories or moving to higher offense levels within category VI, as the
district court did in this case. United States v. Cash, 

,
561 n.6 (4th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, #6D 6D6D# U.S. ___, 

(U.S. May 17, 1993) (No. 92-8142). However, the district court
should consider each succeeding category and depart further only
after making a finding that the category does not adequately represent
the defendant's past criminal conduct. United States v. Rusher, 

, 884-85 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 

. The district
court made the required findings in this case; Rusher does not call for
a detailed discussion of each succeeding category or offense level.

We therefore affirm the sentence imposed by the district court. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argu-
ment would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

                    3