Filed: Mar. 26, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-6651 ELIJAH RANSOM, Petitioner - Appellant, versus SEWALL B. SMITH; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-92- 2805-L) Submitted: December 5, 1995 Decided: March 26, 1996 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. El
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-6651 ELIJAH RANSOM, Petitioner - Appellant, versus SEWALL B. SMITH; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-92- 2805-L) Submitted: December 5, 1995 Decided: March 26, 1996 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eli..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-6651 ELIJAH RANSOM, Petitioner - Appellant, versus SEWALL B. SMITH; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-92- 2805-L) Submitted: December 5, 1995 Decided: March 26, 1996 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elijah Ransom, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Kathryn Grill Graeff, Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recom- mendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Ransom v. Smith, No. CA-92-2805-L (D. Md. Apr. 4, 1995). We deny Appel- lant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2