Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Smith, 95-6793 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-6793 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jan. 16, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-6793 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MILTON MARK SMITH, a/k/a Pete, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-90-195-G, CA-94-521-2) Submitted: December 12, 1995 Decided: January 16, 1996 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. A
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-6793 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MILTON MARK SMITH, a/k/a Pete, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-90-195-G, CA-94-521-2) Submitted: December 12, 1995 Decided: January 16, 1996 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Milton Mark Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Francis Joseph, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magis- trate judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Smith, Nos. CR-90-195-G; CA-94-521-2 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer