Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Waters v. Summer, 95-7079 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-7079 Visitors: 20
Filed: Feb. 21, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7079 CURTIS WATERS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus T. H. SUMMER; NEWBERRY COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-1976-3-17-BC) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 21, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affi
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7079 CURTIS WATERS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus T. H. SUMMER; NEWBERRY COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-1976-3-17-BC) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 21, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Curtis Waters, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Gary Tusten Pope, POPE & HUDGENS, P.A., Newberry, South Carolina; Vinton DeVane Lide, LIDE, MONTGOMERY, POTTS & MEDLOCK, P.C., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying re- lief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Waters v. Summer, No. CA-94-1976-3-17-BC (D.S.C. June 26, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer