Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Cunningham v. Thompson, 95-7265 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-7265 Visitors: 17
Filed: Feb. 01, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7265 PETER X. CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus C. E. THOMPSON; C. HESTER, Assistant Warden; S. L. BATTS, Assistant Warden; S. R. WHITTEN, Grievance Coordinator; DOCTOR SHELTON; DOCTOR WRAY; NURSE BLAKELY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-1042) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided:
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7265 PETER X. CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus C. E. THOMPSON; C. HESTER, Assistant Warden; S. L. BATTS, Assistant Warden; S. R. WHITTEN, Grievance Coordinator; DOCTOR SHELTON; DOCTOR WRAY; NURSE BLAKELY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-1042) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 1, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Peter X. Cunningham, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Sandra Morris Holleran, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cunningham v. Thompson, No. CA-94-1042 (E.D. Va. Aug. 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer