Filed: May 07, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7269 In Re: MICHAEL WAYNE MONTGOMERY, a/k/a Shaka Macumba Zulu X, Appellant. No. 96-6231 In Re: MICHAEL WAYNE MONTGOMERY, a/k/a Shaka Macumba Zulu X, Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (MISC-95-136) Submitted: April 16, 1996 Decided: May 7, 1996 Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7269 In Re: MICHAEL WAYNE MONTGOMERY, a/k/a Shaka Macumba Zulu X, Appellant. No. 96-6231 In Re: MICHAEL WAYNE MONTGOMERY, a/k/a Shaka Macumba Zulu X, Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (MISC-95-136) Submitted: April 16, 1996 Decided: May 7, 1996 Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7269 In Re: MICHAEL WAYNE MONTGOMERY, a/k/a Shaka Macumba Zulu X, Appellant. No. 96-6231 In Re: MICHAEL WAYNE MONTGOMERY, a/k/a Shaka Macumba Zulu X, Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (MISC-95-136) Submitted: April 16, 1996 Decided: May 7, 1996 Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Wayne Montgomery, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders imposing and implementing a prefiling injunction against him. We have re- viewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. In re Michael Wayne Montgomery, No. MISC-95-136 (D.S.C. Aug. 17, 1995 & Jan. 25, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
