Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Turner v. Geise, 95-7323 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-7323 Visitors: 19
Filed: Feb. 01, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7323 MARK A. TURNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, and JAMES FARROW; DEMETRIUS BOYD; TERRENCE JEFFERSON; HERMAN KINARD; CARLOS FERREINA, Plaintiffs, versus BARNER GEISE, Chief Solicitor; JEFFERY BLOOM, Chief Public Defender; STATE OF SOUTH CARO- LINA; COUNTY OF RICHLAND, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CA
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7323 MARK A. TURNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, and JAMES FARROW; DEMETRIUS BOYD; TERRENCE JEFFERSON; HERMAN KINARD; CARLOS FERREINA, Plaintiffs, versus BARNER GEISE, Chief Solicitor; JEFFERY BLOOM, Chief Public Defender; STATE OF SOUTH CARO- LINA; COUNTY OF RICHLAND, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-1829-3-21BC) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 1, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark A. Turner, Appellant Pro Se. 2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magis- trate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Turner v. Geise, No. CA-95-1829-3-21BC (D.S.C. July 31, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer