Filed: Jan. 24, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7357 DAVID FELTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; JAMES P. BAILEY, United States Magistrate Judge; JERRY CLAYTON; H. M. MICHAUX; DURHAM COUNTY; DURHAM CITY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-153-F) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 24, 1996 Before RUSSELL,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7357 DAVID FELTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; JAMES P. BAILEY, United States Magistrate Judge; JERRY CLAYTON; H. M. MICHAUX; DURHAM COUNTY; DURHAM CITY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-153-F) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 24, 1996 Before RUSSELL, ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7357 DAVID FELTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; JAMES P. BAILEY, United States Magistrate Judge; JERRY CLAYTON; H. M. MICHAUX; DURHAM COUNTY; DURHAM CITY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-153-F) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 24, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Felton, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to ap- peal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Felton v. North Carolina, No. CA-93-153-F (E.D.N.C. July 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
