Filed: Feb. 01, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7369 TERRY FITZGERALD ZIMMERMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus J. V. TURLINGTON, Administrator; R. FUTRELL, Superintendent; GEORGE FULLWOOD, Instructor, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-95-666-5-BO) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 1, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judge
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7369 TERRY FITZGERALD ZIMMERMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus J. V. TURLINGTON, Administrator; R. FUTRELL, Superintendent; GEORGE FULLWOOD, Instructor, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-95-666-5-BO) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 1, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7369
TERRY FITZGERALD ZIMMERMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
J. V. TURLINGTON, Administrator; R. FUTRELL,
Superintendent; GEORGE FULLWOOD, Instructor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District
Judge. (CA-95-666-5-BO)
Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 1, 1996
Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terry Fitzgerald Zimmerman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of
the district court. Zimmerman v. Turlington, No. CA-95-666-5-BO
(E.D.N.C. Aug. 25, 1995). See also Inmates v. Owens,
561 F.2d 560,
562-63 (4th Cir. 1977) (inmate must claim that he personally sus-
tained deprivation of a right to state a § 1983 claim). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2