Filed: Jan. 24, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7434 LOUIS PARKER, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RONALD W. ANGELONE; JAMES A. SMITH, JR., Regional Administrator; H. R. POWELL, Warden of Deerfield Correctional Center; PATRICIA ANN COPELAND, Assistant Warden of Treatment & Programs, Deerfield Correctional Center; S. D. MAYES, Chief of Security, Deerfield Correc- tional Center; DENNIS BURGRESS, Operations Officer; JOHN STEWART, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the U
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7434 LOUIS PARKER, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RONALD W. ANGELONE; JAMES A. SMITH, JR., Regional Administrator; H. R. POWELL, Warden of Deerfield Correctional Center; PATRICIA ANN COPELAND, Assistant Warden of Treatment & Programs, Deerfield Correctional Center; S. D. MAYES, Chief of Security, Deerfield Correc- tional Center; DENNIS BURGRESS, Operations Officer; JOHN STEWART, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the Un..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7434
LOUIS PARKER, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RONALD W. ANGELONE; JAMES A. SMITH, JR.,
Regional Administrator; H. R. POWELL, Warden
of Deerfield Correctional Center; PATRICIA ANN
COPELAND, Assistant Warden of Treatment &
Programs, Deerfield Correctional Center; S. D.
MAYES, Chief of Security, Deerfield Correc-
tional Center; DENNIS BURGRESS, Operations
Officer; JOHN STEWART,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District
Judge. (CA-95-992-AM)
Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 24, 1996
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Louis Parker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing
without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Because
Appellant may amend his complaint to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8
with respect to his § 1983 claims, the district court's dismissal
order is not a final, appealable order. Therefore, we dismiss this
appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar
Workers Local Union 392,
10 F.3d 1064 (4th Cir. 1993); 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291 (1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2