Filed: Jan. 25, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7539 W. A. MACGUIRE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DENNIS BAUGH, Probation and Parole Officer; ROBIN HARPER, Probation Officer; ALAN RASMUSSEN, Probation and Parole Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-95-776-R) Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 25, 1996 Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, an
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7539 W. A. MACGUIRE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DENNIS BAUGH, Probation and Parole Officer; ROBIN HARPER, Probation Officer; ALAN RASMUSSEN, Probation and Parole Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-95-776-R) Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 25, 1996 Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7539
W. A. MACGUIRE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DENNIS BAUGH, Probation and Parole Officer;
ROBIN HARPER, Probation Officer; ALAN
RASMUSSEN, Probation and Parole Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.
(CA-95-776-R)
Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 25, 1996
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
W. A. MacGuire, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
William A. MacGuire appeals the district court's order denying
his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration of the court's
dismissal of his complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(d) (1988). The notice of appeal brings up for review
MacGuire's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint as well as the motion
for reconsideration. See Dove v. CODESCO,
569 F.2d 807, 809 (4th
Cir. 1978). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. MacGuire v. Baugh, No. CA-95-
776-R (E.D. Va. Aug. 8, 1995; Sept. 5, 1995). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2