Filed: Mar. 21, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7625 RICKY WAYNE BOBLETT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RON ANGELONE; PATRICK GURNEY; DANIEL MAHON; WARDEN, DWCC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-71-R) Submitted: February 27, 1996 Decided: March 21, 1996 Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curia
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7625 RICKY WAYNE BOBLETT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RON ANGELONE; PATRICK GURNEY; DANIEL MAHON; WARDEN, DWCC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-71-R) Submitted: February 27, 1996 Decided: March 21, 1996 Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7625 RICKY WAYNE BOBLETT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RON ANGELONE; PATRICK GURNEY; DANIEL MAHON; WARDEN, DWCC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-71-R) Submitted: February 27, 1996 Decided: March 21, 1996 Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ricky Wayne Boblett, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Boblett v. Angelone, No. CA-95-71-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 5, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
