Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bethea v. Scott, 95-7633 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-7633 Visitors: 26
Filed: Jan. 25, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7633 ANDREA BETHEA; DEBORAH HUBBARD, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus MARY SCOTT, Warden; RICHARD CANNON, Deputy Warden; AUBREY MOORE, Deputy Warden; LAURIE TAMKIN, Librarian; DOUG CATOE, Acting Commissioner, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Falcon B. Hawkins, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-1892-2-1AJ) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: Ja
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7633 ANDREA BETHEA; DEBORAH HUBBARD, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus MARY SCOTT, Warden; RICHARD CANNON, Deputy Warden; AUBREY MOORE, Deputy Warden; LAURIE TAMKIN, Librarian; DOUG CATOE, Acting Commissioner, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Falcon B. Hawkins, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-1892-2-1AJ) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 25, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andrea Bethea, Deborah Hubbard, Appellants Pro Se. Joseph Crouch Coleman, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magis- trate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bethea v. Scott, No. CA-95-1892-2-1AJ (D.S.C. Sept. 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer