Filed: May 09, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7639 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TYRONE RUSSELL WALKER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-93-358-A, CA-95-548-AM) Submitted: December 26, 1995 Decided: May 9, 1996 Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7639 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TYRONE RUSSELL WALKER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-93-358-A, CA-95-548-AM) Submitted: December 26, 1995 Decided: May 9, 1996 Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished p..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7639 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TYRONE RUSSELL WALKER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-93-358-A, CA-95-548-AM) Submitted: December 26, 1995 Decided: May 9, 1996 Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrone Russell Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Walker, Nos. CR-93-358-A; CA-95-548-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 4, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
