Filed: Apr. 10, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7768 RICHARD WILLIAM BRESEE, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JON GALLEY, Warden, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 95-495-PJM) Submitted: January 30, 1996 Decided: April 10, 1996 Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard W
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7768 RICHARD WILLIAM BRESEE, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JON GALLEY, Warden, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 95-495-PJM) Submitted: January 30, 1996 Decided: April 10, 1996 Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Wi..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7768 RICHARD WILLIAM BRESEE, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JON GALLEY, Warden, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 95-495-PJM) Submitted: January 30, 1996 Decided: April 10, 1996 Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard William Bresee, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Charles Wellington Thompson, Jr., County Attorney, Linda B. Thall, Senior Assistant County Attorney, David Eugene Stevenson, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bresee v. Galley, No. CA-95-495-PJM (D. Md. Oct. 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2