Filed: Apr. 10, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7787 HENRY ERIC HAMILTON; JAMES KINSLER; LENWOOD R. PIPPINS; PHILLIP CLEMENTS; LARRY DANIEL BRATT; JOHN AYERS, JR.; BARRY D. HOLDAWAY; GREGORY R. JOHNSON, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus WILLIAM L. SMITH, Warden; JAMES B. MURPHY, Se- curity Chief; RICHARD LANHAM, Commissioner of Corrections; GARY HORNBAKER, Assistant Warden, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, a
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7787 HENRY ERIC HAMILTON; JAMES KINSLER; LENWOOD R. PIPPINS; PHILLIP CLEMENTS; LARRY DANIEL BRATT; JOHN AYERS, JR.; BARRY D. HOLDAWAY; GREGORY R. JOHNSON, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus WILLIAM L. SMITH, Warden; JAMES B. MURPHY, Se- curity Chief; RICHARD LANHAM, Commissioner of Corrections; GARY HORNBAKER, Assistant Warden, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7787
HENRY ERIC HAMILTON; JAMES KINSLER; LENWOOD R.
PIPPINS; PHILLIP CLEMENTS; LARRY DANIEL BRATT;
JOHN AYERS, JR.; BARRY D. HOLDAWAY; GREGORY R.
JOHNSON,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
WILLIAM L. SMITH, Warden; JAMES B. MURPHY, Se-
curity Chief; RICHARD LANHAM, Commissioner of
Corrections; GARY HORNBAKER, Assistant Warden,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-95-
1076-AMD)
Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 10, 1996
Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Henry Eric Hamilton, James Kinsler, Lenwood R. Pippins, Phillip
Clements, Larry Daniel Bratt, John Ayers, Jr., Barry D. Holdaway,
Gregory R. Johnson, Appellants Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Audrey J.S. Carrion, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his
motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the
district court's opinions and find no abuse of discretion and no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Hamilton v. Smith, No. CA-95-1076-AMD (D. Md. Oct.
6 & 23, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3