Filed: Feb. 09, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7796 ERIC M. EVANS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RON ANGELONE; W. J. TOWNLEY, Defendants - Appellees, and MS. VASS, Nurse of Facility, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-1043) Submitted: January 30, 1996 Decided: February 9, 1996 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublish
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7796 ERIC M. EVANS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RON ANGELONE; W. J. TOWNLEY, Defendants - Appellees, and MS. VASS, Nurse of Facility, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-1043) Submitted: January 30, 1996 Decided: February 9, 1996 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublishe..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7796 ERIC M. EVANS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RON ANGELONE; W. J. TOWNLEY, Defendants - Appellees, and MS. VASS, Nurse of Facility, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-1043) Submitted: January 30, 1996 Decided: February 9, 1996 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eric M. Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assis- tant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Evans v. Angelone, No. CA-94-1043 (W.D. Va. Oct. 4, 1995) and No. CA-94-1043(R) (W.D. Va. Apr. 27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
