Filed: Mar. 21, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7809 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BERNARDO OSPINA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-90-346-A, CA-95-636-AM) Submitted: March 12, 1996 Decided: March 21, 1996 Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bernar
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7809 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BERNARDO OSPINA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-90-346-A, CA-95-636-AM) Submitted: March 12, 1996 Decided: March 21, 1996 Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bernard..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7809 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BERNARDO OSPINA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-90-346-A, CA-95-636-AM) Submitted: March 12, 1996 Decided: March 21, 1996 Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bernardo Ospina, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ospina, Nos. CR-90-346-A; CA-95-636-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
