Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

95-7872 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-7872 Visitors: 22
Filed: Apr. 10, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 82 F.3d 410 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Gregory H. JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lieutenant STONE; M.J. McDade, Superintendent; Odis Temple, Superintendent, Defendant-Appellee. Gregory H. Jones, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W.E. McMICHAEL; Mr. Karasow; Mr. Crutchfeld; F
More

82 F.3d 410

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Gregory H. JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Lieutenant STONE; M.J. McDade, Superintendent; Odis
Temple, Superintendent, Defendant-Appellee.
Gregory H. Jones, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
W.E. McMICHAEL; Mr. Karasow; Mr. Crutchfeld; Franklin E.
Freeman, Jr.; Lynn Phillips; Rickie Robinson; Randall
Lee; Kenneth Whitehead; C.E. Jones; Alonzo Wiggins;
Guard Sledge, Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 95-7872, 95-7876.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 21, 1996.
Decided April 10, 1996.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-94-406-CT-5-BO, CA-94-490-5-CT)

Gregory H. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. William McBlief, Jane Ray Garvey, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Stone, No. CA-94-406-CT-5-BO; Jones v. McMichael, No. CA-94-490-5-CT (E.D.N.C. Nov. 13 and 14, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer