Filed: Feb. 08, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7883 MARK CONVERTINO, Petitioner - Appellant, versus J. M. JABE, Warden, Greenville Correctional Center; JAMES L. GILMORE, Attorney General of the State of Virginia, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-210-3) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 8, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUT
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7883 MARK CONVERTINO, Petitioner - Appellant, versus J. M. JABE, Warden, Greenville Correctional Center; JAMES L. GILMORE, Attorney General of the State of Virginia, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-210-3) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 8, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTT..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7883 MARK CONVERTINO, Petitioner - Appellant, versus J. M. JABE, Warden, Greenville Correctional Center; JAMES L. GILMORE, Attorney General of the State of Virginia, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-210-3) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 8, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark Convertino, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Cauthorne Daniel, Assis- tant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to ap- peal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Convertino v. Jabe, No. CA-95-210-3 (E.D. Va. Oct. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2