Filed: Apr. 12, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7945 ROY LEE OWENS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WAYNE W. KOWALSKI, Special Agent DEA; NEAL GODFREY, Special Agent SBI; TIM MONROE, Detective Sergeant, Moore County Sheriff Department; SHERIFF OF GUILFOD COUNTY; RUSSELL ELIASON, Magistrate Judge; RICHARD S. GLASER, JR., Assistant United States Attorney; JAMES CRAVEN, III; RICHARD C. ERWIN, Judge; EPHRAIM VANDORIAN STANCIL, Government Witness; ANDREW NEWMAN RICHMOND, JR., G
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7945 ROY LEE OWENS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WAYNE W. KOWALSKI, Special Agent DEA; NEAL GODFREY, Special Agent SBI; TIM MONROE, Detective Sergeant, Moore County Sheriff Department; SHERIFF OF GUILFOD COUNTY; RUSSELL ELIASON, Magistrate Judge; RICHARD S. GLASER, JR., Assistant United States Attorney; JAMES CRAVEN, III; RICHARD C. ERWIN, Judge; EPHRAIM VANDORIAN STANCIL, Government Witness; ANDREW NEWMAN RICHMOND, JR., Go..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7945
ROY LEE OWENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WAYNE W. KOWALSKI, Special Agent DEA; NEAL
GODFREY, Special Agent SBI; TIM MONROE,
Detective Sergeant, Moore County Sheriff
Department; SHERIFF OF GUILFOD COUNTY; RUSSELL
ELIASON, Magistrate Judge; RICHARD S. GLASER,
JR., Assistant United States Attorney; JAMES
CRAVEN, III; RICHARD C. ERWIN, Judge; EPHRAIM
VANDORIAN STANCIL, Government Witness; ANDREW
NEWMAN RICHMOND, JR., Government Witness; W.R.
MYERS, Special Agent SBI,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-95-602-2)
Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 12, 1996
Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roy Lee Owens, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
relief on his Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971), complaint. We have reviewed the
record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate
judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Owens v.
Kowalski, No. CA-95-602-2 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 1995). We deny Ap-
pellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3