Filed: Apr. 16, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-8538 DAVID T. CAREY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIAM C. DUNCIL, Warden; ROY WHITE, Hospital Administrator; DAVID SMITH, Nurse; JENNIFER SIMMONS, Nurse, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, District Judge. (CA-95-12-2) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 16, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-8538 DAVID T. CAREY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIAM C. DUNCIL, Warden; ROY WHITE, Hospital Administrator; DAVID SMITH, Nurse; JENNIFER SIMMONS, Nurse, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, District Judge. (CA-95-12-2) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 16, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges,..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-8538 DAVID T. CAREY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIAM C. DUNCIL, Warden; ROY WHITE, Hospital Administrator; DAVID SMITH, Nurse; JENNIFER SIMMONS, Nurse, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, District Judge. (CA-95-12-2) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 16, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David T. Carey, Appellant Pro Se. Jill M. Jerabek, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia; Peter Gregory Zurbuch, Bridgette Rhoden Wilson, BUSCH & TALBOTT, Elkins, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1988) complaint concerning the administration of his medication. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Carey v. Duncil, No. CA-95-12-2 (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 20, 1995). We deny Appel- lant's motion to compel the district court to provide him with transcripts at no cost. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2