Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Lewis v. Andrews, 95-8539 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-8539 Visitors: 3
Filed: Apr. 16, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-8539 GEORGE M. LEWIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, and GREGORY BERNARD HARSLEY, SR.; ELLIOTT GAINES; KIASI POWELL; ROY LEE PERRY; JOSEPH S. ROBIN- SON; BRUCE J. PAQUETTE; STEPHEN E. MCCLELLAND; YURU A. YURU A. AL-MU'MIN; M. SULAIMANI; WILLIAM B. RILEY; JAMES D. PARKER; KARL GENE WARD; DONALD THOMAS BARONE; PAUL PATRICK MCCARTHY; ROBERT A. MILLER; WILLIE STEWART BEY; EDWARD X. ANDREWS; JAMIE FURLOUGH; WILLIAM A. SCOTT; CALVIN ARCH
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-8539 GEORGE M. LEWIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, and GREGORY BERNARD HARSLEY, SR.; ELLIOTT GAINES; KIASI POWELL; ROY LEE PERRY; JOSEPH S. ROBIN- SON; BRUCE J. PAQUETTE; STEPHEN E. MCCLELLAND; YURU A. YURU A. AL-MU'MIN; M. SULAIMANI; WILLIAM B. RILEY; JAMES D. PARKER; KARL GENE WARD; DONALD THOMAS BARONE; PAUL PATRICK MCCARTHY; ROBERT A. MILLER; WILLIE STEWART BEY; EDWARD X. ANDREWS; JAMIE FURLOUGH; WILLIAM A. SCOTT; CALVIN ARCHER; LOUIS L. SPEIGHT; DAVID L. WRIGHT; ANDRE CRAIG MOORE, Plaintiffs, versus HUNTER B. ANDREWS; BRUCE MEADOWS, Secretary of State Board of Elections of Virginia; TOM MOSS, House Speaker of the General Assembly of Virginia; DOROTHY F. KEA, General Register of County of State Board of Elections; TEM STAN- LEY; GEORGE ALLEN, Governor of Virginia; JAMES S. GILMORE, III, Attorney General of Virginia; KEITH LAWRENCE WHITE; LONNIE X. JONES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-95-1396-AM) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 16, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Maurice Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lewis v. Andrews, No. CA-95-1396-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 5, 1995; Nov. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer