Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Barge v. Daily Journal Corp, 96-1037 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-1037 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jul. 12, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1037 JEFF BARGE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION; T/A WASHINGTON JOURNAL, and several of its officers and em- ployees; CHARLES MUNGER; GERALD SALZMAN; J. P. GUERIN; TIMOTHY SUMNER ROBINSON; CAROL ANGEL; LISA ADAMS; ANDREJS ZOMMERS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-95-2972-9-19
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1037 JEFF BARGE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION; T/A WASHINGTON JOURNAL, and several of its officers and em- ployees; CHARLES MUNGER; GERALD SALZMAN; J. P. GUERIN; TIMOTHY SUMNER ROBINSON; CAROL ANGEL; LISA ADAMS; ANDREJS ZOMMERS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-95-2972-9-19AJ) Submitted: June 28, 1996 Decided: July 12, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeff Barge, Appellant Pro Se. Wallace K. Lightsey, WYCHE, BURGESS, FREEMAN & PARHAM, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we af- firm on the reasoning of the district court. Barge v. Daily Journal Corp., No. CA-95-2972-9-19AJ (D.S.C. Dec. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade- quately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer