Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Battles v. Anne Arundel County, 96-1070 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-1070 Visitors: 15
Filed: Sep. 03, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1070 CHERYL ANNE BATTLES, Plaintiff - Appellant, and EMILY ELIZABETH MCCANN, Plaintiff, versus ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION; ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, Superintendent; ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph H. Young, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-508-Y) Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: S
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1070 CHERYL ANNE BATTLES, Plaintiff - Appellant, and EMILY ELIZABETH MCCANN, Plaintiff, versus ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION; ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, Superintendent; ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph H. Young, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-508-Y) Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 3, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cheryl Anne Battles, Appellant Pro Se. B. Darren Burns, ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Annapolis, Maryland; Shelly Eilene Mintz, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on her civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Battles v. Anne Arundel County Board of Education, No. CA-95-508-Y (D. Md. Nov. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer