Filed: Sep. 13, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1170 ABHIMANYU SWAIN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent - Appellee. On Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 94-16556) Submitted: September 5, 1996 Decided: September 13, 1996 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Abhimanyu Swain, Appellant Pro Se. Gary R. Allen, Kenneth
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1170 ABHIMANYU SWAIN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent - Appellee. On Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 94-16556) Submitted: September 5, 1996 Decided: September 13, 1996 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Abhimanyu Swain, Appellant Pro Se. Gary R. Allen, Kenneth ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1170 ABHIMANYU SWAIN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent - Appellee. On Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 94-16556) Submitted: September 5, 1996 Decided: September 13, 1996 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Abhimanyu Swain, Appellant Pro Se. Gary R. Allen, Kenneth L. Greene, William J. Patton, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the tax court's decision finding defi- ciencies for tax years 1989 and 1990. We have reviewed the record and the tax court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the tax court. Swain v. Commissioner, No. 94-16556 (Tax Ct. Jan. 23, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
