Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Sykes v. Davenport, 96-1324 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-1324 Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 18, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1324 SARAH ANNE SYKES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LOUIS DAVENPORT, A Law Enforcement Officer with the Town of Bladenboro, NC, in his individual capacity, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Chief Dis- trict Judge. (CA-95-136) Submitted: November 26, 1996 Decided: December 18, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1324 SARAH ANNE SYKES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LOUIS DAVENPORT, A Law Enforcement Officer with the Town of Bladenboro, NC, in his individual capacity, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Chief Dis- trict Judge. (CA-95-136) Submitted: November 26, 1996 Decided: December 18, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Odum Richardson, Richard Brooks Glazier, BEAVER, HOLT, RICHARDSON, STERNLICHT, BURGE & GLAZIER, P.A., Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Louis Davenport, Appellee Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac- cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sykes v. Davenport, No. CA-95-136 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer