Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Mintz v. Vance, 96-1342 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-1342 Visitors: 25
Filed: Dec. 30, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1342 GABRIEL MINTZ, a minor, by his parents and next friends; EMILY MINTZ; DANIEL MINTZ, Plaintiffs - Appellants, and NORMAN CORREA, a minor, by his parents and next friends; FRANCISCO CORREA; LUCY CORREA, Plaintiffs, versus PAUL VANCE, (Officially as) Superintendent; MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1342 GABRIEL MINTZ, a minor, by his parents and next friends; EMILY MINTZ; DANIEL MINTZ, Plaintiffs - Appellants, and NORMAN CORREA, a minor, by his parents and next friends; FRANCISCO CORREA; LUCY CORREA, Plaintiffs, versus PAUL VANCE, (Officially as) Superintendent; MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 94-1738-DKC) Argued: December 4, 1996 Decided: December 30, 1996 Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. ARGUED: Michael Jeffrey Eig, BOGIN & EIG, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellants. David Charles Hjortsberg, REESE & CARNEY, L.L.P., Columbia, Maryland, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Judith S. Bresler, REESE & CARNEY, L.L.P., Columbia, Maryland; Zvi Greismann, Senior Attorney, MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Gabriel Mintz and his parents, Daniel and Emily Mintz, appeal an order of the district court granting summary judgment to the defendants, a county school board and its superintendent, in the Mintzes' suit to recover attorney's fees under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. ยง 1400 et seq. We have con- sidered the briefs and arguments of the parties, and we affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons stated by that court in its memorandum opinion. Correa v. Vance, No. DKC 94-1738 (D. Md. Feb. 9, 1996). AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer