Filed: Sep. 17, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1670 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GRACE HAWKINS COOK, a/k/a Grace L. Cook, Claimant - Appellant, and 8619 MULBERRY STREET, LAUREL, MARYLAND, with all buildings, appurtenances and improvements thereon, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 93-3970-PJM) Submitted: September 5, 1996 Decided: September
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1670 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GRACE HAWKINS COOK, a/k/a Grace L. Cook, Claimant - Appellant, and 8619 MULBERRY STREET, LAUREL, MARYLAND, with all buildings, appurtenances and improvements thereon, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 93-3970-PJM) Submitted: September 5, 1996 Decided: September ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1670
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
GRACE HAWKINS COOK, a/k/a Grace L. Cook,
Claimant - Appellant,
and
8619 MULBERRY STREET, LAUREL, MARYLAND, with
all buildings, appurtenances and improvements
thereon,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
93-3970-PJM)
Submitted: September 5, 1996 Decided: September 17, 1996
Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Grace Hawkins Cook, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Charles Kay, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying Ap-
pellant's request for relief pursuant to the Eighth Amendment Ex-
cessive Fines Clause. We have reviewed the record and the district
court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant
leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district court's
decision. See United States v. Chandler,
36 F.3d 358 (4th Cir.
1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3