Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Joseph v. INS, 96-1867 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-1867 Visitors: 19
Filed: Dec. 04, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1867 ADELISE JOSEPH, Petitioner, versus U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A29-692-530) Submitted: November 19, 1996 Decided: December 4, 1996 Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, Arlington, Virginia, for Peti
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1867 ADELISE JOSEPH, Petitioner, versus U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A29-692-530) Submitted: November 19, 1996 Decided: December 4, 1996 Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Frank W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, Brenda E. Ellison, Senior Litigation Counsel, Laura M. Friedman, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Wash- ington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision and order affirming the immigration judge's denial of Appellant's motion to reopen her deportation proceedings and to stay deportation pursuant to 8 C.F.R. ยง 242.22 (1995). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based on sub- stantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Joseph v. INS, No. A29-692- 530 (B.I.A. June 11, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer