Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Nardi v. Showalter, 96-2155 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-2155
Filed: Oct. 23, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-2155 STEPHEN F. NARDI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus W. RAYMOND SHOWALTER, JR.; DORIS SHOWALTER; DAVID BOWMAN, t/a Pro Park, Richmond, VA, t/a Pro Park, Harrisonburg, VA, d/b/a LLC Limited Liability Company; ROBERT GRAVES; SCOTT GRAVES; THOMAS EUBANK; RICK BROWN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. James H. Michael, Jr., Senior Distric
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-2155 STEPHEN F. NARDI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus W. RAYMOND SHOWALTER, JR.; DORIS SHOWALTER; DAVID BOWMAN, t/a Pro Park, Richmond, VA, t/a Pro Park, Harrisonburg, VA, d/b/a LLC Limited Liability Company; ROBERT GRAVES; SCOTT GRAVES; THOMAS EUBANK; RICK BROWN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. James H. Michael, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-12-H) Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 23, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stephen F. Nardi, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Thomas St. Ours, WHARTON, ALDHIZER & WEAVER, Harrisonburg, Virginia; Holmes Conrad Harrison, III, HARRISON, THUMMA & STARK, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his copyright infringement action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nardi v. Showalter, No. CA-96-12-H (W.D. Va. July 22, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer