UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6030 HAROLD O. HILL, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SHERWOOD R. MCCABE; S. L. MELVIN; JOHN V. WELLONS; JAMES B. FRENCH; JAMES SMITH, Doctor, Defendants - Appellees. No. 96-6075 HAROLD ORLANDO HILL, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus EARL BUTLER; DAN FORD; ED GRANNIS; CUMBERLAND COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; JOHN DOE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge; Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-95-849-F, CA-95-955- 5-CT-H) Submitted: May 14, 1996 Decided: May 24, 1996 2 Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harold O. Hill, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders dismissing two 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed the rec- ords and the district court's opinions regarding these claims and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissals on the reasoning of the district court. Hill v. McCabe, No. CA-95-849- F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 13, 1995); Hill v. Butler, No. CA-95-955-5-CT-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 5, 1996). We modify the orders to reflect that the dismissals are without prejudice. 28 U.S.C. § 2106 (1988). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED 3 4