Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Robert Lee Brock, A/K/A Two Souls Walker v. Ron Angelone, 96-6116 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-6116 Visitors: 258
Filed: May 21, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 86 F.3d 1148 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Robert Lee BROCK, a/k/a Two Souls Walker, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ron ANGELONE, Defendant-Appellee. No. 96-6116. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: May 16, 1996. Decided: May 21, 1996. Appeal from the
More

86 F.3d 1148

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert Lee BROCK, a/k/a Two Souls Walker, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Ron ANGELONE, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 96-6116.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 16, 1996.
Decided: May 21, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-95-1194-2)

Robert Lee Brock, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59 motion. Both orders are properly before the court. Dove v. CODESCO, 569 F.2d 807, 810 (4th Cir.1978). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brock v. Angelone, No. CA-95-1194-2 (E.D. Va. Dec. 28, 1995; Jan. 17, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer