Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Summers v. Sturgill, 96-6200 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-6200 Visitors: 9
Filed: May 03, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6200 LOU ELLEN SUMMERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JEFF STURGILL; DON E. EARLS; WISE COUNTY SHER- IFF'S DEPARTMENT; M. E. MUIR, Deputy Sheriff of Wise County, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-95-137-B) Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: May 3, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHA
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6200 LOU ELLEN SUMMERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JEFF STURGILL; DON E. EARLS; WISE COUNTY SHER- IFF'S DEPARTMENT; M. E. MUIR, Deputy Sheriff of Wise County, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-95-137-B) Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: May 3, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lou Ellen Summers, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff Sturgill, Wise, Vir- ginia; Don E. Earls, Norton, Virginia; James Rutledge Henderson, IV, HENDERSON & DE COURCY, P.C., Tazewell, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Summers v. Sturgill, No. CA-95-137-B (W.D. Va. Jan. 22, 1996). Additionally, we deny the Appellees' motions to dismiss. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer