Filed: Aug. 07, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6288 STEVEN WHISENANT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-96-121-R) Submitted: July 25, 1996 Decided: August 7, 1996 Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven Whisenant,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6288 STEVEN WHISENANT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-96-121-R) Submitted: July 25, 1996 Decided: August 7, 1996 Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven Whisenant, A..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6288
STEVEN WHISENANT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RONALD J. ANGELONE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.
(CA-96-121-R)
Submitted: July 25, 1996 Decided: August 7, 1996
Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Whisenant, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
motion for a preliminary injunction to prohibit the Defendant from
confiscating his typewriter while he has litigation pending. We
have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find
no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. See Direx Israel,
Ltd. v. Breakthrough Medical Corp.,
952 F.2d 802, 812-13 (4th Cir.
1991). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Whisenant v. Angelone, No. CA-96-121-R (W.D. Va. Feb. 9,
1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2