Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Furr v. Director, 96-6369 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-6369 Visitors: 16
Filed: Dec. 31, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6369 CHANNING T. FURR, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DIRECTOR, Virginia Department of Corrections; DALE A. GARDNER, Sheriff; DARNLEY HODGE, Supervisor, Clarke-Frederick-Winchester Adult Detention Center, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-1098-R) Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: Decembe
More
                             UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



                             No. 96-6369



CHANNING T. FURR,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

DIRECTOR, Virginia Department of Corrections;
DALE A. GARDNER, Sheriff; DARNLEY HODGE,
Supervisor, Clarke-Frederick-Winchester Adult
Detention Center,

                                           Respondents - Appellees.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District
Judge. (CA-94-1098-R)


Submitted:   December 19, 1996          Decided:     December 31, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit
Judge.


Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


J. Lloyd Snook, III, SNOOK & HAUGHEY, P.C., Charlottesville,
Virginia; John Christian Lowe, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellant.
Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIR-
GINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 (1994), amended
by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L.

No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. Furr v. Director, No. CA-94-

1098-R (W.D. Va. Feb. 7, 1996). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.




                                                         DISMISSED




                                 2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer