UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6461 HAROLD OWEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, and GERALD DAVID OWEN, Plaintiff, versus DANNY HOLDEN, Deputy; DAVID D. JONES, Former FBI Agent; STANLEY R. KEEL, FBI Agent; MAX O. COGBURN, Former Assistant United States Attor- ney; KENNETH D. BELL, Assistant United States Attorney; FREDERICK D. HESS, Director, Office of Enforcement Operations; CITIZENS TELEPHONE COMPANY, and its employees; JOHN M. QUIGLEY, FBI Agent, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-93-139) Submitted: August 15, 1996 Decided: August 20, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harold Owen, Appellant Pro Se. Tyrus Vance Dahl, Jr., WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Clifford Carson Marshall, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Ashe- ville, North Carolina; Michael Kernodle Pratt, RAMSEY, HILL, SMART, RAMSEY & PRATT, P.A., Brevard, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration of the order dismissing his civil com- plaint claiming that he was subjected to an unlawful wiretap. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Owen v. Holden, No. CA-93-139 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 31 & Feb. 23, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2