Filed: Dec. 18, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6532 DARRYL ASMAR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBIN CUFFY, Director Food Services, FCI Morgantown; LESLIE R. BILOTTI, Cook Super- visor, FCI Morgantown; BRENDA BARRETT, Health Services Director, FCI Morgantown; WILLIAM THOMPSON, Warden, FCI Morgantown, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior District Judge. (
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6532 DARRYL ASMAR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBIN CUFFY, Director Food Services, FCI Morgantown; LESLIE R. BILOTTI, Cook Super- visor, FCI Morgantown; BRENDA BARRETT, Health Services Director, FCI Morgantown; WILLIAM THOMPSON, Warden, FCI Morgantown, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior District Judge. (C..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6532
DARRYL ASMAR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROBIN CUFFY, Director Food Services, FCI
Morgantown; LESLIE R. BILOTTI, Cook Super-
visor, FCI Morgantown; BRENDA BARRETT, Health
Services Director, FCI Morgantown; WILLIAM
THOMPSON, Warden, FCI Morgantown,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior
District Judge. (CA-95-73-1)
Submitted: December 12, 1996 Decided: December 18, 1996
Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darryl Asmar, Appellant Pro Se. Patrick Michael Flatley, Assistant
United States Attorney, Daniel W. Dickinson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
relief on his complaint brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named
Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have
reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Asmar v. Cuffy, No. CA-95-73-1 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 22,
1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2